======Social Media and Fragmentation====== =====Summary===== Fragmentation in society increases vulnerability to manipulation, misinformation, and propaganda, particularly through the rapid amplification of information on social media. While social media has been used for positive change by socially conscious consumers and consumer activists, it has also exposed illegal and morally ambiguous behaviors, leading to reputation risks for individuals and organizations. The speed and impact of these risks have prompted a reevaluation of risk management practices. The impact of social media extends beyond risk management, as questions arise regarding data security, free speech, platform regulation, nationalist and populist views, and cybersecurity. Governments and organizations face the challenge of finding the right balance in addressing these issues and the pressures of empowered individuals who leverage social media to voice their concerns and drive change. This empowerment, coupled with declining trust in established institutions, contributes to the rise of misinformation, polarization, and divisions across various societal aspects. The loss of shared realities and the fragmentation of society pose challenges to collective sense-making and action. Without an understanding of counter-narratives, fragmentation is amplified, which can lead to disruption. However, this situation also presents an opportunity to rebuild shared identities and narratives in positive ways, fostering a sense of connection and belonging within communities. Strengthening community ties becomes crucial in combating polarization and societal fragmentation. If adequate solutions are not implemented, collective anxiety will continue to rise, and people may seek comfort in problematic ideologies and theories. Additionally, pressures on social welfare systems, healthcare, urbanization, population decline, and other factors contribute to the fragmentation and instability of society, increasing vulnerability to unrest. By addressing these challenges, promoting shared narratives, and strengthening social connections, we can mitigate the negative impacts of fragmentation and instability, fostering a more resilient and cohesive society. ---- /* If your summary gets longer than a couple paragraphs, consider splitting it up under multiple subheadings */ =====In Futures Research===== ====Chaos or Connection? The Global Media and Information Landscape in 2035==== [[library:Chaos_or_Connection_The_Global_Media_and_Information_Landscape_in_2035|Chaos or Connection? The Global Media and Information Landscape in 2035]] by [[encyclopedia:global_governance_futures|Global Governance Futures]] analyzes the future of media and information landscape until 2035. It explores how emerging technologies like AI, virtual reality, and blockchain will impact media consumption and distribution, leading to a fragmented media landscape. The article stresses the importance of adapting regulatory frameworks and promoting digital literacy to effectively navigate this fragmentation and ensure a balanced and informed media environment. ====The Future of Immigration: Four Paths==== [[library:The_Future_of_Immigration_Four_Paths|The Future of Immigration: Four Paths]] by [[encyclopedia:institute_for_the_future|Institute for the Future]] provides an analysis of potential trends and scenarios surrounding immigration. It explores factors such as globalization, technology, and policy changes that may shape the future of immigration. The document presents four different scenarios, highlighting the complex and evolving nature of immigration and its potential impact on societies, economies, and individuals in the coming years. One of the 5 supplementary drivers that defines the scenarios is "Media & Culture," highlighting the fragmentation of the 20th-century media landscape and the emergence of new forms of digital propaganda and manipulation through AI-generated personas, news bots, and deep fakes, which undermine institutional legitimacy and will continue evolving with the rise of user-generated AI. ====The Future of Risk: New Game, New Rules==== [[library:The_Future_of_Risk_New_Game_New_Rules|The Future of Risk: New Game, New Rules]] by [[encyclopedia:deloitte|Deloitte]] explores the evolving landscape of risk management. It explores 10 drivers and discusses how advancements in technology, globalization, and changing business models are reshaping the risk landscape for organizations. One of those 10 drivers is "Reputation risks accelerate and amplify" which looks at the interconnected world where mobile devices, social media, and evolving societal expectations. ====The Future of Sense Making==== [[library:the_future_of_sensemaking|The Future of Sense-making]] by [[encyclopedia:policy_horizons_canada|Policy Horizons Canada]] examines the changing landscape of sense-making in an increasingly complex and information-rich world. It discusses the impact of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, on the way individuals and organizations make sense of information. The document emphasizes the need for adaptive sense-making strategies, collaboration across disciplines, and ethical considerations to effectively navigate the challenges and opportunities of the future. ====Scenarios for the Russian Federation==== [[library:Scenarios_for_the_Russian_Federation|Scenarios for the Russian Federation]] by [[encyclopedia:world_economic_forum|World Economic Forum]] analyzes four different scenarios for the future of Russia, based on varying levels of economic, political, and social development. These scenarios range from a “Global Reset” that sees a complete overhaul of the world economy, to a “Low Momentum” scenario where Russia stagnates in its current state. One of the influential global forces shaping these scenarios is "social media and vulnerability of elites". Growing vulnerability undermines global elites as new media technologies empower people to expose corruption and demand accountability, including in Russia where elite reactions are critical. ====The OECD Scenarios for the Future of Schooling==== [[library:The_OECD_Scenarios_for_the_Future_of_Schooling|The OECD Scenarios for the Future of Schooling]] by [[encyclopedia:oecd|OECD]] is a chapter of four scenarios for 2040: * Schooling extended * Education outsourced * Schools as learning hubs * Learn-as-you-go Schools as learning hubs considered increasing polarization and fragmentation as one of the signals from the present influencing the scenario. ====A summary of potential cross-cutting missions to address future societal challenges in Norway==== [[library:A_summary_of_potential_crosscutting_missions_to_address_future_societal_challenges_in_Norway|A summary of potential cross-cutting missions to address future societal challenges in Norway]] by [[encyclopedia:rand|RAND]] is a study commissioned by the Research Council of Norway. The study focuses on strategic areas such as oceans, green transition, health and welfare, cohesion and globalization, and technology and digitalization, aiming to identify priority missions and structural measures to address societal challenges in Norway. For scenarios they considered topics under economy and society such as: "discrimination and hate speech" and "use of social media to spread disinformation". ====Exploring Europe's Capability Requirements for 2035 and Beyond==== [[library:exploring_europes_capability_requirements_for_2035_and_beyond|Exploring Europe's Capability Requirements for 2035 and Beyond]] by RAND examines the security and defense challenges that European societies may face in the future. It highlights societal factors that could contribute to unrest and conflict, such as polarization along various divisions and the strain on welfare systems due to population decline and increased urbanization. The report emphasizes the need for European defense organizations to adapt and maintain operational advantage in order to address these potential challenges effectively. ====Central America: 2030 trends==== [[library:Central_America_2030_trends|Central America: 2030 trends]] by [[encyclopedia:global_americans|Global Americans]] provides an analysis of the security challenges faced by Central America and the role of the United States Department of Defense (DoD) in addressing these challenges. It highlights the region's high levels of violence, transnational criminal organizations, and weak governance as key concerns. The report takes the issues concerning the region into 5 themes: security and violence; weak institutional capacity; economic growth; demography; and technology. 'Technology and communications' states Central America's high internet penetration has facilitated personal connections and pro-U.S. sentiment, but it also exposes the region to risks of misinformation and exploitation by criminal networks. Except for Panama, Central American countries lack cybersecurity awareness and struggle to establish institutions for cybersecurity and law enforcement. =====Additional Viewpoints===== ---- ---- ~~DISCUSSION~~ =====Further Reading===== Categories: =====Citations===== /* Do not add anything below this line, footnotes will automatically generate below */