======Misdemeanor Prosecution and Recidivism====== This study examines the impact of nonprosecution of nonviolent misdemeanors on future criminal behavior. \\ \\ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\ ^ Quick Facts ^^ |Report location: |[[https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-11/RB279.pdf|source]] | |Language: |English | |Publisher: |[[encyclopedia:cato_institute|CATO Institute]] | |Authors: | Anna Harvey, Jennifer Doleac, Amanda Agan | |Time horizon: |2004 | |Geographic focus: |Suffolk County, Massachusetts | =====Methods===== The researchers used data from the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office, covering 2004-2018, to analyze the impact of nonprosecution on future criminal justice system contact. They compared the outcomes of defendants based on the leniency of the assistant district attorneys at arraignment. \\ \\ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\ =====Key Insights===== The research investigates the effects of nonprosecution of nonviolent misdemeanors on recidivism, using data from Suffolk County, Massachusetts. It finds that nonprosecution significantly reduces future criminal complaints and suggests that lenient handling of such cases could decrease future criminal justice involvement, particularly benefiting black residents. \\ \\ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\ =====Additional Viewpoints===== Categories: {{tag>2000s_time_horizon}} | {{tag>2004_time_horizon}} | {{tag>English_publication_language}} | {{tag>Massachusetts_geographic_scope}} | {{tag>Suffolk_County_geographic_scope}} | {{tag>ada_leniency}} | {{tag>criminal_justice}} | {{tag>empirical_analysis}} | {{tag>future_criminal_complaints}} | {{tag>misdemeanor_prosecution}} | {{tag>nonprosecution_impact}} | {{tag>nonviolent_offenses}} | {{tag>policy_change_effects}} | {{tag>race_disparities}} | {{tag>recidivism}} ~~DISCUSSION~~