This article explores cosmopolitan security as a potential model for future global security, comparing it with state-centric, multilateral, and market-based perspectives through the lens of the conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
| Quick Facts | |
|---|---|
| Report location: | source |
| Language: | English |
| Publisher: |
humsec journal |
| Authors: | Tom Van Der Hor |
| Geographic focus: | Bosnia And Herzegovina, Kosovo, Global |
The research method involved a comparative analysis of cosmopolitan security with three other security perspectives—state-centric, multilateral, and market-based—applied to the historical context of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. The study examined pre-conflict, conflict, and post-conflict stages to evaluate the potential of cosmopolitan security as a future global security model.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
The report examines cosmopolitan security as an alternative to traditional security models, analyzing its application in the conflicts of Bosnia and Kosovo. It assesses the effectiveness of cosmopolitan security in comparison to state-centric, multilateral, and market-based approaches, considering pre-conflict sanctions, wartime interventions, and post-conflict governance. The study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of cosmopolitan security, questioning its feasibility as a comprehensive model for global security.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Categories: Bosnia And Herzegovina geographic scope | English publication language | Global geographic scope | Kosovo geographic scope | cosmopolitan security | global civil society | global security | human rights | international law | market-based perspective | market-based security | multilateral perspective | multilateral security | post-conflict governance | pre-conflict sanctions | protection | security | state-centric perspective | state-centric security | wartime interventions