This report analyzes various Horizon Scanning (HS) approaches to inform the European Commission on creating an effective HS framework. It reviews five HS methods, discusses their integration with policy-making, and recommends strategies for the European Forum for Forward Looking Activities (EFFLA).
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
| Quick Facts | |
|---|---|
| Report location: | source |
| Language: | English |
| Publisher: | netstrategics, European Commission |
| Authors: | Huw Williams |
| Geographic focus: | Global, Singapore, Australia, European Union |
The research method involved desk research and expert interviews to evaluate five Horizon Scanning approaches: Singapore's RAHS, Australia's AJASN, Metafore, iKnow, and the UK's Sigmascan. The study assessed their processes, tools, and integration with policy-making.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
The study examines Horizon Scanning models from Singapore, Australia, Metafore, iKnow, and Sigmascan, comparing them against a SESTI-defined model. It evaluates their effectiveness in identifying emerging risks and opportunities and suggests a framework for Horizon Scanning within the European Commission (EC), focusing on tools, databases, and human intelligence (HUMINT) roles.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Categories: Australia geographic scope | English publication language | European Union geographic scope | Global geographic scope | Singapore geographic scope | databases | emerging risks | european union | horizon scanning | humint | innovation | integration | policy-making | recommendations | research | science | science and technology | sesti model | technology | tools