Site Tools

EXPLORE
By Tag By Geographic focus By Time Horizon By Topic By Publication Year By Document Type Index of Tags
By Section Library Encyclopedia Futures Hub Users
Social Newsletter About Us Slack Linkedin Twitter
EDITORS
Learn to Edit User Guide Policies Playground
Contribute Tasks Board Library Additions Contributor Slack
Tools Recent Changes Media Manager Sitemap
ACCOUNT
RegisterLog In


Follow on

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
hub:general_notability_guidelines [2023/06/29 19:15] – elizabethherfelhub:general_notability_guidelines [2023/07/26 17:25] (current) – typos elizabethherfel
Line 56: Line 56:
  
 A topic is presumed to merit an article if: A topic is presumed to merit an article if:
-  * Unordered List ItemIt meets the general notability guideline (GNG) for the appropriate section: Library, Encyclopedia, or Futures.+  * It meets the general notability guideline (GNG) for the appropriate section: Library, Encyclopedia, or Futures.
   * It cannot be entirely or adequately covered by an existing Open Foresight Hub article.   * It cannot be entirely or adequately covered by an existing Open Foresight Hub article.
 ==== Library Entries ==== ==== Library Entries ====
Line 106: Line 106:
 If there is a topic you believe has impact and influence or expert recognition but you don’t have reliable sources you can [[hub:propose_encyclopedia_content|propose encyclopedia content]]. If there is a topic you believe has impact and influence or expert recognition but you don’t have reliable sources you can [[hub:propose_encyclopedia_content|propose encyclopedia content]].
  
-Futures Entries+====Futures Entries====
 In the spirit of collaboration, users are encouraged to build upon existing articles in the Futures section before starting a new entry. A Futures entry is suitable for a stand-alone article when the item has: In the spirit of collaboration, users are encouraged to build upon existing articles in the Futures section before starting a new entry. A Futures entry is suitable for a stand-alone article when the item has:
    
Line 124: Line 124:
  
 If an existing article gets too long, complicated, or disproportionately covers a particular sub-topic or point of view, editors may choose to split it into two or more separate articles. Splitting articles is permitted as long as each resulting article meets the above requirements for stand-alone articles. If an existing article gets too long, complicated, or disproportionately covers a particular sub-topic or point of view, editors may choose to split it into two or more separate articles. Splitting articles is permitted as long as each resulting article meets the above requirements for stand-alone articles.
 +
 Similarly, if two or more similar articles are too short or insubstantial to exist as stand-alone articles, editors may choose to merge them into one. Similarly, if two or more similar articles are too short or insubstantial to exist as stand-alone articles, editors may choose to merge them into one.
  
 === The Futures section is not === === The Futures section is not ===
  
-Static - if you want to share your work in the futures namespace, you are inviting and encouraging others to edit, remix, share, and distribute it. If that is not what you want, we recommend publishing it elsewhere first and seeing if it fits in the library.+  * Static - if you want to share your work in the futures namespace, you are inviting and encouraging others to [[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en|edit, remix, share, and distribute it]]. If that is not what you want, we recommend publishing it elsewhere first and seeing if it fits in the library.
  
  
Last modified: 2023/06/29 19:15 by elizabethherfel