Conclusion: ‘‘Foresight for smart globalization’’ synthesis statement and recommendations
The report discusses the integration of poverty considerations into foresight activities to improve decision-making and address global poverty.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
| Quick Facts | |
|---|---|
| Report location: | source |
| Language: | English |
| Publisher: | |
| Authors: | Claudia Juech, Evan S. Michelson, Clement Bezold |
| Geographic focus: | Global |
Methods
The research method involved drafting a synthesis statement and recommendations based on the themes and ideas from the background papers and discussions at the “Foresight for smart globalization” workshop.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Key Insights
The report concludes a workshop on “Foresight for smart globalization,” emphasizing the need for governance changes to tackle global poverty and the importance of enhancing national foresight capacities. It advocates for incorporating poverty explicitly in foresight activities like scenario planning and trend analysis. The synthesis statement highlights foresight as a tool for understanding complex systems and creating action paths, particularly in addressing poverty. The recommendations suggest improving governance, fostering national foresight, developing participatory approaches, conducting technology road mapping for the poor, and mapping conflict and economic development associations. The report aims to establish pro-poor foresight as a regular component of future foresight activities.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Additional Viewpoints
Categories: English publication language | Global geographic scope | capacity building | conflict mapping | economic development | foresight | governance | participatory approaches | poverty | scenario planning | technology road mapping | trend analysis