Concurrent Design Foresight
This report discusses how to develop a modeling tool that integrates knowledge from foresight activities for use in policymaking. It emphasizes the need for integrated foresight methods to enhance evidence-based policymaking, identify future policy areas, and create an inclusive research and innovation agenda.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
| Quick Facts | |
|---|---|
| Report location: | source |
| Language: | English |
| Publisher: | European Commission |
| Authors: | Angela Wilkinson, Cécile Wendling (rapporteur), Filippo Addarii, Ilkka Tuomi, Kristian Lindgren, Marguerite Grandjean, Matthias Weber, Walter Stahel, Jonathan Köhler (chair) |
| Geographic focus: | European Union |
| Page count: | 67 pages |
Methods
The research method involved reviewing existing foresight structures and processes within the European Commission, evaluating current ideas about foresight processes for policy development, and proposing the concept of Concurrent Design Foresight.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Key Insights
The report reviews the European Commission's current foresight structures and processes for policy development. It introduces Concurrent Design Foresight as a concept that offers breadth, accommodates conflicting interests, and responds quickly to policy development needs. The report suggests that policymakers would benefit from a platform supporting Concurrent Design Foresight with both non-numerical and numerical modeling.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Additional Viewpoints
Categories: English publication language | European Union geographic scope | community research policy | concurrent design | evidence-based policymaking | foresight | future challenges | innovation | non-numerical modeling | numerical modeling | policy development | product design | prospective technological studies | research | research and development | research and innovation | research method | science | stakeholder engagement | systems thinking | technology