Transprudentiality: Complementary Ecosociopsychonomies - Why Capitalism Needs Them
This report explores the need for Complementary Ecosociopsychonomies (CEs) as a means to address the limitations of capitalism in providing sustainable livelihoods for all.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
| Quick Facts | |
|---|---|
| Report location: | source |
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Joseph Edozien |
| Geographic focus: | Global |
Methods
The research method involves a theoretical examination of the current global financial system and its limitations, the proposal of innovative solutions, and the conceptualization of new economic structures to support sustainable livelihoods.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Key Insights
The report by Joseph Edozien discusses the necessity of establishing Complementary Ecosociopsychonomies (CEs) to mitigate the risks and limitations of capitalism, which struggles to provide for everyone's needs. It suggests that capitalism should focus on areas where it excels and divest from social liabilities, allowing CEs to support those it cannot. The report proposes the creation of GEIST (Global Ecosociopsychonomic Innovations Superfund Trust) to fund and manage CE projects, emphasizing the importance of diverse, inclusive, and independent innovation in the public interest.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Additional Viewpoints
Categories: English publication language | Global geographic scope | capitalism | complementary ecosociopsychonomies | cost reduction | ecosociopsychonomics | finance | financial systems | financial transformation | geist | global financial system | non-profit economy | sovereign insolvency | systemic unemployment | transprudentiality