Participatory scenarios as a tool to link science and policy on food security under climate change in East Africa
This report evaluates the effectiveness of participatory scenario development in linking science and policy for sustainable development and food security under climate change in East Africa.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
| Quick Facts | |
|---|---|
| Report location: | source |
| Language: | English |
| Publisher: |
CGIAR Research Program On Climate Change |
| Authors: | Andrew Ainslie, Joost Vervoort, Patti Kristjanson, Polly Ericksen, Moushumi Chaudhury |
| Geographic focus: | East Africa, Africa |
Methods
The research method involved multi-stakeholder scenario development workshops, questionnaires for participants, and an analysis of the process based on criteria for effective boundary work, including credibility, salience, legitimacy, and capacity building.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Key Insights
The study examines the use of participatory scenarios as a tool to bridge the gap between knowledge generation and policy-making, focusing on food security under climate change in East Africa. It assesses the credibility, legitimacy, and salience of the scenario process and identifies ways to improve its effectiveness. The research highlights the importance of including diverse stakeholders and the need for quantification and communication of scenarios to enhance their utility for policy development.
(Generated with the help of GPT-4)
Additional Viewpoints
Categories: Africa geographic scope | East Africa geographic scope | English publication language | boundary work | capacity building | climate change | credibility | east africa | food | food security | legitimacy | multi-stakeholder scenarios | participatory scenarios | salience | science-policy link | sustainable development